Leia o texto abaixo:
Is there a difference between reading on screen and reading on paper in terms of
comprehension?
Research published recently showed the different effects of comprehension of reading on paper
versus reading on screen. Paper-based reading produced better outcomes. The authors said:
‘Although there are clear advantages of digital-based assessment and learning,
including reduced costs and increased individualization, research indicates that there
may be disadvantages as well.’
The researchers raised the question about whether ‘increasing exposure to technology, with its
emphasis on speed and multitasking, may encourage a shallower kind of processing that leads to a
decrease in deep comprehension in digital environments’.
They found that research studies that had used only narrative texts showed that comprehension
was not affected, whether the reading was done on paper or on screen. In contrast, in the studies
that involved information texts or a mixture of information texts and narratives, paper-based reading
was advantageous.
(Disponível em: https://www.oxfordowl.co.uk/).
Com base no texto, pode-se concluir que:
I. Há uma vantagem para a leitura no papel, a despeito da tipologia textual.
II. Não houve diferenças de compreensão entre meios (digital ou impresso) em textos narrativos.
III. As diferenças observadas se deram quando foram comparadas leituras de textos narrativos ou
um misto de textos narrativos e expositivos, ou seja, há uma vantagem declarada na leitura no
papel.
Quais estão INCORRETAS?