Logo
QuestõesDisciplinasBancasDashboardSimuladosCadernoRaio-XBlog
Logo Questionei

Links Úteis

  • Início
  • Questões
  • Disciplinas
  • Simulados

Legal

  • Termos de Uso
  • Termos de Adesão
  • Política de Privacidade

Disciplinas

  • Matemática
  • Informática
  • Português
  • Raciocínio Lógico
  • Direito Administrativo

Bancas

  • FGV
  • CESPE
  • VUNESP
  • FCC
  • CESGRANRIO

© 2026 Questionei. Todos os direitos reservados.

Feito com ❤️ para educação

/
/
/
/
/
/
  1. Início/
  2. Questões/
  3. Língua Inglesa/
  4. Questão 457941201017396

No trecho do quinto parágrafo – Nor are they welfare for underpaid ...

📅 2010🏢 VUNESP🎯 PM-SP📚 Língua Inglesa
#Compreensão de Texto

Esta questão foi aplicada no ano de 2010 pela banca VUNESP no concurso para PM-SP. A questão aborda conhecimentos da disciplina de Língua Inglesa, especificamente sobre Compreensão de Texto.

Esta é uma questão de múltipla escolha com 5 alternativas. Teste seus conhecimentos e selecione a resposta correta.

1

457941201017396
Ano: 2010Banca: VUNESPOrganização: PM-SPDisciplina: Língua InglesaTemas: Compreensão de Texto
Texto associado

Instrução: Leia o texto para responder a questão.

The Big Destructiveness Of The Tiny Bribe

Alexandra Wrage 03.01.2010

    The smallest bribes can be the most vexing. Not suitcases full of money and transfers to offshore accounts, but the thousands of everyday payments people make to Indian building inspectors, Chinese customs officials and Nigerian airport functionaries, just to get things done. They’re payments for routine government services that a government official is legally obliged to perform but for which he’s hoping to skim off a little extra.

    Unlike more serious bribes, these very modest payouts, formally known as “facilitating payments”, are not against the laws of the U.S., Canada, Australia, New Zealand or South Korea, when made abroad. They’re illegal for Great Britain, but the Serious Fraud Office there has taken the extraordinary public position that they’re unlikely to give rise to a prosecution.

    Why don’t governments that lead the fight against large-scale bribery fall in line with what is already the practice of many major companies? They don’t want to outlaw such small-scale graft in foreign places, they say, because they don’t have the manpower to prosecute violators. By that logic, communities with just enough resources to handle murder and armed robbery would give a green light to shoplifting. You’d think a government could at least go after a few high-profile cases to set an example and a precedent. Permitting these smaller payments has to impede the effort to crack down on the larger ones. Companies know this.

    “Facilitating” bribes are not tips. Tipping is voluntary, and you decide to do it after a service has been rendered. You don’t pay it at the outset to induce the waiter to bring the food, and you can always go somewhere else to eat next time should the service be bad.

    Nor are they welfare for underpaid civil servants. If government workers are underpaid, we should compensate them for the cost of customs inspections or airport security by aboveboard means, through taxation and so forth. Payment to individuals not only slows service but also encourages entrepreneurial civil servants to increase their income by creating more and greater obstacles.

    Nor are they a mere distraction from the fight against bigger bribes. Rather, they fuel the problem. Junior officials who look for small bribes rise to higher positions by paying off those above them. Corruption creates pyramids of illegal payments flowing upward. Legalizing the base of the pyramid gives it a strong and lasting foundation.

    Nor are these payments legal where they’re made. They may not be banned by the wealthy countries mentioned above, but they are outlawed in the countries where they’re actually a problem. Do developed countries want to say they wouldn’t tolerate such payments at home but don’t care if they’re made abroad? And since they’re illegal in the countries where they’re paid, companies can’t put them on their books. The classic cover for a bribe is to call it a “consulting fee”, but that is a books and records violation that is illegal in any country.

(www.forbes.com. Adaptado.)

No trecho do quinto parágrafo – Nor are they welfare for underpaid civil servants. – a palavra they refere-se a
Gabarito comentado
Anotações
Marcar para revisão

Acelere sua aprovação com o Premium

  • Gabaritos comentados ilimitados
  • Caderno de erros inteligente
  • Raio-X da banca
Conhecer Premium

Questões relacionadas para praticar

Questão 457941200481933Língua Inglesa

Assinale a alternativa correta.

#Compreensão de Texto
Questão 457941200515415Língua Inglesa

“Phenomenon”, in the second paragraph, and “basis” in the third, are pluralized as “phenomena” and “bases”, respectively. A number of other English wo...

#Substantivos e Compostos#Plural dos Substantivos
Questão 457941201399263Língua Inglesa

One example of the collocation named phrasal verb can be found in alternative:

#Compreensão de Texto
Questão 457941201479117Língua Inglesa

O item 1 encontra respaldo em documentos oficiais para o ensino de língua estrangeira no Brasil no que concerne

#Compreensão de Texto
Questão 457941201634077Língua Inglesa

Read the two quotations by two researchers, commenting on some lexico-grammatical features of English as a lingua franca: “Seidlhofer (2004) points ou...

#Compreensão de Texto
Questão 457941201914258Língua Inglesa

No trecho do quarto parágrafo – Companies were also forced to pay more to hire and retain workers because of the country’s low unemployment. – because...

#Compreensão de Texto

Continue estudando

Mais questões de Língua InglesaQuestões sobre Compreensão de TextoQuestões do VUNESP