Logo
QuestõesDisciplinasBancasDashboardSimuladosCadernoRaio-XBlog
Logo Questionei

Links Úteis

  • Início
  • Questões
  • Disciplinas
  • Simulados

Legal

  • Termos de Uso
  • Termos de Adesão
  • Política de Privacidade

Disciplinas

  • Matemática
  • Informática
  • Português
  • Raciocínio Lógico
  • Direito Administrativo

Bancas

  • FGV
  • CESPE
  • VUNESP
  • FCC
  • CESGRANRIO

© 2026 Questionei. Todos os direitos reservados.

Feito com ❤️ para educação

/
/
/
/
/
/
  1. Início/
  2. Questões/
  3. Língua Inglesa/
  4. Questão 457941201289224

O tema principal do texto é:

📅 2010🏢 VUNESP🎯 PM-SP📚 Língua Inglesa
#Compreensão de Texto

Esta questão foi aplicada no ano de 2010 pela banca VUNESP no concurso para PM-SP. A questão aborda conhecimentos da disciplina de Língua Inglesa, especificamente sobre Compreensão de Texto.

Esta é uma questão de múltipla escolha com 5 alternativas. Teste seus conhecimentos e selecione a resposta correta.

1

457941201289224
Ano: 2010Banca: VUNESPOrganização: PM-SPDisciplina: Língua InglesaTemas: Compreensão de Texto
Texto associado

Instrução: Leia o texto para responder a questão.

The Big Destructiveness Of The Tiny Bribe

Alexandra Wrage 03.01.2010

    The smallest bribes can be the most vexing. Not suitcases full of money and transfers to offshore accounts, but the thousands of everyday payments people make to Indian building inspectors, Chinese customs officials and Nigerian airport functionaries, just to get things done. They’re payments for routine government services that a government official is legally obliged to perform but for which he’s hoping to skim off a little extra.

    Unlike more serious bribes, these very modest payouts, formally known as “facilitating payments”, are not against the laws of the U.S., Canada, Australia, New Zealand or South Korea, when made abroad. They’re illegal for Great Britain, but the Serious Fraud Office there has taken the extraordinary public position that they’re unlikely to give rise to a prosecution.

    Why don’t governments that lead the fight against large-scale bribery fall in line with what is already the practice of many major companies? They don’t want to outlaw such small-scale graft in foreign places, they say, because they don’t have the manpower to prosecute violators. By that logic, communities with just enough resources to handle murder and armed robbery would give a green light to shoplifting. You’d think a government could at least go after a few high-profile cases to set an example and a precedent. Permitting these smaller payments has to impede the effort to crack down on the larger ones. Companies know this.

    “Facilitating” bribes are not tips. Tipping is voluntary, and you decide to do it after a service has been rendered. You don’t pay it at the outset to induce the waiter to bring the food, and you can always go somewhere else to eat next time should the service be bad.

    Nor are they welfare for underpaid civil servants. If government workers are underpaid, we should compensate them for the cost of customs inspections or airport security by aboveboard means, through taxation and so forth. Payment to individuals not only slows service but also encourages entrepreneurial civil servants to increase their income by creating more and greater obstacles.

    Nor are they a mere distraction from the fight against bigger bribes. Rather, they fuel the problem. Junior officials who look for small bribes rise to higher positions by paying off those above them. Corruption creates pyramids of illegal payments flowing upward. Legalizing the base of the pyramid gives it a strong and lasting foundation.

    Nor are these payments legal where they’re made. They may not be banned by the wealthy countries mentioned above, but they are outlawed in the countries where they’re actually a problem. Do developed countries want to say they wouldn’t tolerate such payments at home but don’t care if they’re made abroad? And since they’re illegal in the countries where they’re paid, companies can’t put them on their books. The classic cover for a bribe is to call it a “consulting fee”, but that is a books and records violation that is illegal in any country.

(www.forbes.com. Adaptado.)

O tema principal do texto é:
Gabarito comentado
Anotações
Marcar para revisão

Acelere sua aprovação com o Premium

  • Gabaritos comentados ilimitados
  • Caderno de erros inteligente
  • Raio-X da banca
Conhecer Premium

Questões relacionadas para praticar

Questão 457941200005110Língua Inglesa

From the reading of the third and fourth paragraphs, it is correct to say that CLT syllabuses

#Compreensão de Texto
Questão 457941200613983Língua Inglesa

Para responder à lacuna 43, leia o texto associado.

#Aspectos Linguísticos#Compreensão de Texto#Preposições
Questão 457941201228807Língua Inglesa

No trecho do terceiro parágrafo “learners who practiced communication in place of laboratory pattern drills performed with no less accuracy on discret...

#Compreensão de Texto
Questão 457941201230192Língua Inglesa

Teachers who understand Brown’s exposition in the second paragraph will tend to

#Compreensão de Texto
Questão 457941201415503Língua Inglesa

The citation that is the closest match to the main point in the text is

#Compreensão de Texto
Questão 457941201949795Língua Inglesa

Qual dos fatos listados constitui, segundo o texto, uma experiência científica sobre a possibilidade de vida em outros planetas?

#Compreensão de Texto#Tradução

Continue estudando

Mais questões de Língua InglesaQuestões sobre Compreensão de TextoQuestões do VUNESP