Logo
QuestõesDisciplinasBancasDashboardSimuladosCadernoRaio-XBlog
Logo Questionei

Links Úteis

  • Início
  • Questões
  • Disciplinas
  • Simulados

Legal

  • Termos de Uso
  • Termos de Adesão
  • Política de Privacidade

Disciplinas

  • Matemática
  • Informática
  • Português
  • Raciocínio Lógico
  • Direito Administrativo

Bancas

  • FGV
  • CESPE
  • VUNESP
  • FCC
  • CESGRANRIO

© 2026 Questionei. Todos os direitos reservados.

Feito com ❤️ para educação

/
/
/
/
/
/
  1. Início/
  2. Questões/
  3. Língua Inglesa/
  4. Questão 457941201764701

According to the text, what ELLs students should not have from thei...

📅 2018🏢 FUNDEP (Gestão de Concursos)🎯 Prefeitura de São João del Rei - MG📚 Língua Inglesa
#Compreensão de Texto

Esta questão foi aplicada no ano de 2018 pela banca FUNDEP (Gestão de Concursos) no concurso para Prefeitura de São João del Rei - MG. A questão aborda conhecimentos da disciplina de Língua Inglesa, especificamente sobre Compreensão de Texto.

Esta é uma questão de múltipla escolha com 4 alternativas. Teste seus conhecimentos e selecione a resposta correta.

1

457941201764701
Ano: 2018Banca: FUNDEP (Gestão de Concursos)Organização: Prefeitura de São João del Rei - MGDisciplina: Língua InglesaTemas: Compreensão de Texto
Texto associado
INSTRUCTION: Read carefully the next text; then mark the alternatives that answer the questions or complete the sentences in the question.

Four ways to give ELL students feedback on their writing

Larry Ferlazzo

There does not seem to be clarity among researchers about the best ways to assist ELLs in revising their writing, but they all seem to agree that one of the best things teachers can do is to give ELLs more time - more time to write, more time to think, more time to revise. This need is one of the major reasons why many researchers recommend including an opportunity for peer review and feedback - this process provides more time, as well as providing social support.
One element that we have students use in this process:
1. After students have completed their draft on the computer using Microsoft Word or Google Docs (taking advantage of the spelling and grammar tools available on each), they print out two copies of their essay - one is for their peer reviewer. Each student also gets one copy of the peer review sheet.
The first student who is getting their essay reviewed reads the essay aloud and the reviewer follows along on his/her copy. During this time, both the writer and the reviewer make notes about mistakes and improvements, primarily targeting grammar and sentence construction issues. After the writer is done reading, both he/she and the reviewer discuss the points they both noted. Then, the reviewer goes through the Peer Review sheet one section at a time taking a minute or so to silently read that section of the essay and noting suggestions on the sheet. After he/she is done with each section, the reviewer shares comments with the writer, who makes notes on his/her copy of the essay. This process is repeated until the entire sheet is completed, and then the roles are reversed.
Note that teachers will probably want to modify the Peer Review Sheet to reflect the essay their students are writing.
2. The teachers will then quickly review this “marked-up” version of the essay with the student and, depending on their English proficiency and overall confidence level, may give specific feedback on one or two grammar issues by pointing at the mistake and having students identify the correction. More importantly, they’ll note to themselves what specific skills they need to cover in future lessons.
3. Students will return to the electronic version of the essay they saved and make the revisions identified in the peer review process and in the follow-up conversation teachers had with them.

Pointing

This is a simple way to provide feedback.
A number of studies suggest that correction -- either through prompts that point out the error to a student and require an immediate attempt at a “repair” or through “recasts” when teachers rephrase correctly what the student said -- can be a useful tool to assist language acquisition. When teachers see a written mistake, they commonly point to it - whether it be a word or a punctuation issue. Students are typically then able to correct it then and there.
Available at: <https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/blogs/larryferlazzo/larry-ferlazzo-four-ways-give-ell-students-feedbacktheir-writing>
According to the text, what ELLs students should not have from their teachers is more time to
Gabarito comentado
Anotações
Marcar para revisão

Acelere sua aprovação com o Premium

  • Gabaritos comentados ilimitados
  • Caderno de erros inteligente
  • Raio-X da banca
Conhecer Premium

Questões relacionadas para praticar

Questão 457941200607715Língua Inglesa

The reason the blonde woman’s dress, according to the narrator, was Dior’s favourite dream and the bill the husband’s nightmare is that:

#Compreensão de Texto
Questão 457941200609740Língua Inglesa

The suffix ly, used after adjectives, is formative of adverbs of manner. One of the following words, all found in the text, is not an adverb formed wi...

#Advérbios e Conjunções
Questão 457941200990444Língua Inglesa

What is the relationship between learning and memory, as described in the text?

#Compreensão de Texto
Questão 457941201116941Língua Inglesa

The story is supposed to be about:

#Compreensão de Texto
Questão 457941201408303Língua Inglesa

Cruz, one of the scholars cited in the article, thinks that authentic literary texts

#Compreensão de Texto
Questão 457941201676786Língua Inglesa

According to the text, the authentic reasons we read can be summarized as:

#Compreensão de Texto

Continue estudando

Mais questões de Língua InglesaQuestões sobre Compreensão de TextoQuestões do FUNDEP (Gestão de Concursos)