Logo
QuestõesDisciplinasBancasDashboardSimuladosCadernoRaio-XBlog
Logo Questionei

Links Úteis

  • Início
  • Questões
  • Disciplinas
  • Simulados

Legal

  • Termos de Uso
  • Termos de Adesão
  • Política de Privacidade

Disciplinas

  • Matemática
  • Informática
  • Português
  • Raciocínio Lógico
  • Direito Administrativo

Bancas

  • FGV
  • CESPE
  • VUNESP
  • FCC
  • CESGRANRIO

© 2026 Questionei. Todos os direitos reservados.

Feito com ❤️ para educação

/
/
/
/
/
/
  1. Início/
  2. Questões/
  3. Língua Inglesa/
  4. Questão 457941201920527

Lee and Pope believe

📅 2024🏢 COSEAC🎯 UFF📚 Língua Inglesa
#Compreensão de Texto

Esta questão foi aplicada no ano de 2024 pela banca COSEAC no concurso para UFF. A questão aborda conhecimentos da disciplina de Língua Inglesa, especificamente sobre Compreensão de Texto.

Esta é uma questão de múltipla escolha com 4 alternativas. Teste seus conhecimentos e selecione a resposta correta.

1

457941201920527
Ano: 2024Banca: COSEACOrganização: UFFDisciplina: Língua InglesaTemas: Compreensão de Texto
Texto associado

TEXT 1


What do AI chatbots really mean for students and cheating?

October 31, 2023 By

Carrie Spector


The launch of ChatGPT and other artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots has triggered an alarm for many educators, who worry about students using the technology to cheat by passing its writing off as their own. But two Stanford researchers say that concern is misdirected, based on their ongoing research into cheating among U.S. high school students before and after the release of ChatGPT.


Here, Lee and Pope discuss the state of cheating in U.S. schools, what research shows about why students cheat, and their recommendations for educators working to address the problem.


What do we know about how much students cheat?


Pope: We know that cheating rates have been high for a long time. At Challenge Success we’ve been running surveys and focus groups at schools for over 15 years, asking students about different aspects of their lives — the amount of sleep they get, homework pressure, extracurricular activities, family expectations, things like that — and also several questions about different forms of cheating.


For years, long before ChatGPT hit the scene, some 60 to 70 percent of students have reported engaging in at least one “cheating” behavior during the previous month. That percentage has stayed about the same or even decreased slightly in our 2023 surveys, when we added questions specific to new AI technologies, like ChatGPT, and how students are using it for school assignments.


So AI isn’t changing how often students cheat — just the tools that they’re using?


Lee: The most prudent thing to say right now is that the data suggest, perhaps to the surprise of many people, that AI is not increasing the frequency of cheating. This may change as students become increasingly familiar with the technology, and we’ll continue to study it and see if and how this changes. But I think it’s important to point out that, in Challenge Success’ most recent survey, students were also asked if and how they felt an AI chatbot like ChatGPT should be allowed for school-related tasks. Many said they thought it should be acceptable for “starter” purposes, like explaining a new concept or generating ideas for a paper. But the vast majority said that using a chatbot to write an entire paper should never be allowed. So this idea that students who’ve never cheated before are going to suddenly run amok and have AI write all of their papers appears unfounded. What would you suggest to school leaders who are concerned about students using AI chatbots?


Pope: Even before ChatGPT, we could never be sure whether kids were getting help from a parent or tutor or another source on their assignments, and this was not considered cheating. Kids in our focus groups are wondering why they can't use ChatGPT as another resource to help them write their papers — not to write the whole thing word for word, but to get the kind of help a parent or tutor would offer. We need to help students and educators find ways to discuss the ethics of using this technology and when it is and isn't useful for student learning.


Lee: There’s a lot of fear about students using this technology. Schools have considered putting significant amounts of money in AI-detection software, which studies show can be highly unreliable. Some districts have tried blocking AI chatbots from school wifi and devices, then repealed those bans because they were ineffective. AI is not going away. Along with addressing the deeper reasons why students cheat, we need to teach students how to understand and think critically about this technology. For starters, at Stanford we’ve begun developing free resources to help teachers bring these topics into the classroom as it relates to different subject areas. We know that 3 teachers don’t have time to introduce a whole new class, but we have been working with teachers to make sure these are activities and lessons that can fit with what they’re already covering in the time they have available.


I think of AI literacy as being akin to driver’s education: We’ve got a powerful tool that can be a great asset, but it can also be dangerous. We want students to learn how to use it responsibly.


Available from: < https://ed.stanford.edu/news/what-do-ai-chatbots-really-mean-students-and-cheating>. Access: 08 Dec., 2023. Adapted. 

Lee and Pope believe
Gabarito comentado
Anotações
Marcar para revisão

Acelere sua aprovação com o Premium

  • Gabaritos comentados ilimitados
  • Caderno de erros inteligente
  • Raio-X da banca
Conhecer Premium

Questões relacionadas para praticar

Questão 457941200206044Língua Inglesa

In the fragment "Not only are you required to keep pace with ever-changing technology, you need to work with and through many people to meet deadlines...

#Aspectos Linguísticos
Questão 457941200259455Língua Inglesa

In the first and second paragraphs, the narrator describes a scene which may provoke, in the reader, a feeling of suspenseful expectation. This may be...

#Compreensão de Texto
Questão 457941200391402Língua Inglesa

The book ‘21 Lessons for the 21st Century’ is cited in the article to:

#Compreensão de Texto
Questão 457941200583321Língua Inglesa

One of the effects of the revolution of streaming services on young people’s entertainment habits is:

#Compreensão de Texto
Questão 457941200872831Língua Inglesa

One of the trickiest gramar aspects in any language is subject-verb agreement. Considering subject-verb agreement, the only correct alternative is:

#Análise Sintática
Questão 457941201588998Língua Inglesa

When addressing people in formal contexts, we it is appropriate to use a title. In the alternatives below, the one which indicates the correct relatio...

#Compreensão de Texto

Continue estudando

Mais questões de Língua InglesaQuestões sobre Compreensão de TextoQuestões do COSEAC