///
World Teachers’ Day, held in October each year in a variety of countries around the world, is an annual event to reflect on the progress teachers have made. But studies in many countries show an erosion of teacher autonomy and public confidence in them, which leads to teachers feeling disempowered and demoralized.
With colleagues in the U.S., Sweden and South Korea, I researched teacher-focused policies in four Nordic countries (Finland, Norway, Sweden and Denmark) and four East Asian countries (Taiwan, Singapore, Japan and South Korea) from 1995 to 2020. All eight countries are stable, wealthy democracies whose school systems are generally regarded as having solid – even exemplary – educational systems. In other words, one might not expect them to be that worried about their teachers. Yet over the 25-year period that we studied, these countries collectively passed 56 national policies that were specifically aimed at reforming some part of teacher career development, education or training. Sometimes these reforms didn’t really help teachers. In fact, some reforms actually undermined the quality of the national teaching force.
Comprehensive teacher policies address at least three key areas: recruitment and training, hiring and placement, and professional development. Denmark was the only nation that specifically targeted recruitment by trying to recruit teachers from the best college graduates. Sweden was the only country to pass a policy vaguely related to teacher placement.
Instead, countries concentrated on policies that set standards for teacher certification, improved work conditions and extended opportunities for professional development. Simply setting standards does not guarantee that qualified teachers will be available where they are needed. For example, due to shortages in certain subjects, teachers are often assigned to teach courses that they are not qualified to teach – something called “out-of-field” teaching.
Despite all the teacher-focused reforms that have occurred, access to qualified teachers remains a major source of educational inequality in the world today.
The text’s content and structure indicate that it has relied on information deriving from